Are you a relatively new comer in the field of digital photography? If you are, well, you should know this: It is hell of a ride! You will need a course on Photography for Beginners.
Almost every person now is becoming an enthusiast with this new comer. If you ask why, well, the answer would be obvious: Eliminated use of negatives, no more money funding for dark room construction, no more bitrates and those chemicals, and no more messed up film jack.
The new generation need Photography for Beginners, therefore, says hi to digital photography.
Although with the emergence of this new genre of photography, and you as a beginner, it would be good to spell out the difference between the two and how each one could contribute on you as photographer.
In film photography, there exists no lcd screen for preview. That means that every shot would only be seen until it is developed. The good thing about it is that it practices your timing and judgment as to which subject deserves a shot. On the other side, the negative part is that your picture requires that "eureka" factor - you have to expend film negatives in order to get that perfect shot. Digital photography provides for its own lcd monitor to preview your shot after capturing. The good thing about it is that you could liberally shoot and shoot, without worrying of film loss and the bad thing is that, the tendency of mediocre pictures might appear, because of some indiscriminate shooting.
Films have different ISOs, depending on each exposure. On the other hand, digital photography has its own ISO setting, which is changeable at will. Best we do a Photography for Beginners course.
Digital photography has this so called raw file that is used as a digital negative. Raw files contains the image's uncompressed color and detail profile, which means that each shot contains the extensive possibility of complete manipulation, from contrast, brightness, darkness, brightness, and so on which are editable on any photo editing software. The bright side is that such process is easier to manipulate, the negative side is that the tendency to dependency.
Film photography, as we all know, requires negative developing which is a "dirtier" work as compared to photo editing. Here, the photographer uses a variety of chemical to expose the photo paper to the light of the negative, the result of which is the picture that the photographer took. The good thing about this is that, the feeling is more gratifying - knowing that you worked (literally) on having the photo. On the other hand, the negative side is the money you would spend on equipments and chemicals. This is all laid out in Photography for Beginners.
As far as blemishes are concerned, film photography may have these so called grains, while digital photography may have noise, especially in images shot in low light conditions.
Overall, the selection is not prejudicial to the photographer you would become. As was shown, each has its own advantage or disadvantage, so it depends on your discretion to select which one would make you happier. But as for the majority, they prefer digital photography.
Film photography is also good for old school photos, but it still better to keep a digital camera in hand. Such gadget is important because it adapts to the more acceptable standards of photography, in terms of the times. The possibilities are endless with digital cameras because of its flexibility and less demanding maintenance. By doing a Photography for Beginners course, then keeping a film camera as a back up would be good at the same time.
Cameras are just but the same gadget, the technology only differs and what is important is that with these tools, you are able to capture the actual beauty and miracle of life.